|
The Road to Serfdom (Routledge Classics) | 
enlarge | Author: F.a. Hayek Publisher: Routledge Category: Book
List Price: £9.99 Buy New: £9.89 You Save: £0.10 (1%)
Rating: 36 reviews Sales Rank: 3143
Media: Paperback Edition: 2 Pages: 272 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.7 Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 5 x 0.9
ISBN: 0415253896 Dewey Decimal Number: 330 EAN: 9780415253895 ASIN: 0415253896
Publication Date: May 17, 2001 Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 31 more reviews...
Liberalism Redux June 14, 2006 PJ Nasser (UK) 36 out of 38 found this review helpful
The thesis of this book is quite a simple one. No one person or group of people can possibly have enough knowledge to effectively run an economy. No-one is able to collect and make use of sufficient information even about the past, let alone the present. Any attempt, therefore, to plan the future is bound to fail. Hayek goes on to postulate that this failure must result in the rule of a dictator as a last desperate fallback to take command of the spiralling chaos. The experience he had in mind, of course, was Nazi Germany whose fate he saw as ineluctable from the birth of the German welfare state in the late 19th Century. The command economy signifies the submission of the individual to the dictates of the planners in whose hands is concentrated the power that was once dispersed among many industrialists. The individual is thus reduced to the condition of the serf who ends up without even the power to sell his labour to a higher bidder.
This is a defence of private property, and the responsibility of the individual for his own fate whatever it may be. It is not libertarian; it does not wish to whittle down the power of the state to a bare minimum. However, aside from the legislation of basic standards, it argues for the exclusion of centralised power from the quick of economic life and the enabling of choice even to the poorest. It is a fundamental text of what was once called liberalism, and is as relevant today as it ever was.
Secure a minimum income for everybody October 20, 2005 Luc REYNAERT (Beernem, Belgium) 31 out of 34 found this review helpful
This book has been heavily criticized by the left, and with reason, for it saws the legs under their table.Hayek's book is a frontal attack on the socialist dream of a centrally planned economy, which should wipe out the cyclical swings in a free market system. For Hayek, a centrally planned economy is a synonym for slavery. Hayed argues rightly that the replacement of free enterprise and competition by collectivism equals he abolition of democracy. As L. Trotzky remarks (quoted in this book): 'In a country where the sole employer is the state, opposition means death by slow starvation. The old principle - who does not work shall not eat - has been replaced by a new one - who does not obey shall not eat.' A centrally planned economy creates a totalitarian system where the end justifies the means, which in other words means a denial of all morals. Moreover, the individual is not respected as a man but becomes a cog in an enormous bureaucracy, where tolerance is not tolerated. For real liberals (like B. Russell) power has been the archevil; to the strict collectivist it is a goal in itself. Hayek is by any means not a pure liberal, because he insists that every state should provide a system of social insurance wth a minimum income for all. Hayek's warnings have been gravely vindicated by the gruelng inhumanity of the totalitarian regimes, created after World War II. This is a great book about liberty and independence, truth and intellectual honesty, peace and democracy and respect for the individual qua man. A must read.
The most important book you will read February 4, 2004 B. Jacobs (London) 22 out of 24 found this review helpful
Written in 1944, in clear, modern English, this book must be one of the all time classics. In a forensic but highly readable analysis, Hayek explains that social justice is the goal of all systems, Socialism, Liberalism etc, and that they are just different approaches as to how to achieve it. He then shows how Socialism despite its very good intentions inevitably leads to the opposite of its goal. Liberalism is seen as the only genuine method to achieve true social justice. It is one of the most rigorous deconstructions of political thought I have ever read and is worthy of a law court, yet remains hugely readable.
An excellent book which truly enlightens us about socialism. April 4, 2001 willpacker50@hotmail.com (London, England) 5 out of 5 found this review helpful
This book written by the world renown Hayek was a revelation at its time of print (1944). Hayek challenged the notion that planning was the true way forward in the post-war world. He pointed to the examples of the Nazis and the Russians in the way in which planning can easily go wrong. This book is written in such a way to be accessible to those who have little previous economic knowledge. In all an excellent book.
A lesson for everyone April 27, 2004 D. Boulton (Bristol) 18 out of 22 found this review helpful
Hayek sets out the case, in concise and clear language, for political andeconomic liberty (and their necessary interconnection) in a morecompelling way than you will find anywhere else. This is the greatestvindication of liberal democracy and market economics that has ever beenwritten, and is a text that should be read by anybody anxious to preventtotalitarian and illiberalism dominating this century in the way that itdid the last. Most significantly, the inherently illiberal nature of socialism isexposed. Liberty and egalitarianism are NOT, Hayek explains, compatible:freedom and socialism are conflicting, not complementary, concepts. Thelogic that socialism and fascism are, essentially, parts of the sameideology - binding individuals to the state and suppressing enterprise andendeavour - is compelling. Hayek's most significant theme, however, is that political and economicliberalism are not separate concepts that can be adopted in isolation fromeach other. Free societies and free economies, he suggests, necessarilyand naturally co-exist. As a 1st year politics student, I just wish that more people had read thisseminal work in political philosophy before swallowing whole warpedMarxist notions that associate the words 'socialism' and 'democracy', and'freedom' and 'equality', in ways that simply ignore their utterincompatibility and explain why the world was at war when Hayek wrote thisbooks in 1944 and why we lived for 50 years under the threat of socialistswith nuclear weapons. You do not need to be a political anorak to gain a lot from this book. Itraises crucial questions about the world in which we live and reacheslargely undeniable conclusions. Read with an open mind, and the logicreally is utterly compelling and does provide a vital lesson for everyone.
|
|
| Powered by good will. | |