Politishop British Democracy Forum in association with Amazon UK
 Location:  Home» International » Search Inside! » Who Owns Antiquity? Museums and the Battle over Our Ancient Heritage: Museums and the Battle Over Our Ancient Heritage  
Latest forum topics
BNP to be sued over DPA failures
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:26:03 GMT
Ukip Shop Launched
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:25:02 GMT
A Good Muslim: Abd Al-Nasser Al-Najjar
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:02:23 GMT
Au revoir
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:27:24 GMT
High Court of Justice. (Admin Court)
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:00:51 GMT
UKIP: MEP attacks 44m Belgian fishing deal
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:00:04 GMT
UKIP Launch Protect Our Pubs Campaign
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:56:11 GMT

Who Owns Antiquity? Museums and the Battle over Our Ancient Heritage: Museums and the Battle Over Our Ancient Heritage

Who Owns Antiquity? Museums and the Battle over Our Ancient Heritage: Museums and the Battle Over Our Ancient Heritage

enlarge enlarge 
Author: James Cuno
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Category: Book

List Price: £14.95
Buy New: £14.20
You Save: £0.75 (5%)



Rating: 1.0 out of 5 stars 1 reviews
Sales Rank: 241536

Media: Hardcover
Pages: 256
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.2
Dimensions (in): 9.2 x 6.1 x 0.8

ISBN: 0691137129
Dewey Decimal Number: 930.1074
EAN: 9780691137124
ASIN: 0691137129

Publication Date: June 1, 2008
Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping
Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours

Similar Items:

  • The Parthenon Marbles: The Case for Reunification
  • Against Cultural Property: Archaeology,Heritage and Ownership (Duckworth Debates in Archaeology)
  • The Acquisition and Exhibition of Classical Antiquities: Professional, Legal, and Ethical Perspectives
  • Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers
  • Hadrian: Empire and Conflict

Customer Reviews:

1 out of 5 stars Nationalistic??   July 12, 2008
L. Filippidis (London)
0 out of 3 found this review helpful

The introduction of the term "universal museum" is obviously done to cover and to justify the reality that the museums in question have indeed collected in many cases artefacts from various countries under dubious if not purely illegal circumstances. Branding the call for repatriation of artefacts to their originating countries as "nationalistic" is simply pathetic. When and by whom was it decided that the museums in question should assume the role of "universal museums"? Was the local population where the artefacts were taken from consulted for this?

Powered by good will.